Penalized for My Faith

I am a normal citizen of India - born and brought up here. My youngest memories, my relations and my friends were all formed here only. Yet, now-a-days I find myself being looked upon as a Pakistani. Why? Because I am Muslim?

I do not support forced singing of "Vande Mataram" because I stand up for a monotheistic faith, and the song has references to godesses and Hindu theology or faith. But anyone who wishes to sing the song should be free to sing it.., if a Muslim friend wishes to sing it of his/her own free will, I will never oppose it. But I do not support force, nor will I sing it. Does that mean I rever India less than an individual who does sing it? Does it make me a lesser Indian?? Is Vande Mataram to be made the yardstick of nationalism or patriotism? When a politician who sells his motherland for 2 pieces of silver sings it, he is proclaimed to be a nationalist. And just because I decline to sing it, am I to be denounced as to love my country any less or to have a lesser pride of its culture and heritage? I feel outraged.

I denounce the Mumbai blasts.. and all blasts and all inhumane actions. I do it as a human and as a Muslim. Which God would demand slaughter of innocent lives? And if a God does demand slaughter of lives, would He be fit for worship?Which faith would propogate violence? And yet, I am a devout Muslim. People ask me about Jihad. They tell me that 9/11 is Jihad, Pakistani militants in Kashmir are doing Jihad. Bull shit!!! Jihad means war in the cause of truth.., and the Prophet teaches that the biggest war is the war that u fight against the falsehood, selfish motives and evil in yourself. When a milkman who is about to adulterate his milk with water, refrains from doing so, even when there is no other witnesses - for the sake of righteousness, for the sake of God, it is the biggest form of Jihad. When ur best friend does something wrong, and u stand up to him and tell him "NO" with all the courage and truth in you, it is Jihad.
War bw nations, bw people when faught for a rightful cause, the people who fight for right are doing Jihad. Indian National Freedom struggle itself is a Jihad. The "Non Co-operation Movement" is a Jihad. Sometimes, physical wars need to be faught for a rightful cause.. but no war can be a Jihad when an innocent life is wiped off. No war.
The rules for war stipulated in Islam are :-
1. Women and children should not be harmed
2. Civillians should be left alone - war is to be faught bw soldiers alone.
3. Trees shouldnt be cut down or harmed.

Allah through Qur'an says " If you save an innocent life, it is equivalent to saving the whole of humanity. And if you kill an innocent life, it is equivalent to killing the whole of humanity".
How then can I, or any muslim for that matter support terrorism.
I keep hearing from people "Not all Muslims are terrorists".
No. What I state emphatically is "No terrorist is a Muslim".

If Ossama Bin Laden is behind 9/11 or any terror attack which has affected an innocent person's life, I can say without a moment's doubt that he is not a muslim inspite of his grand Arabic name and his long beard.

What is happening in Kashmir has nothing to do with Islamic ideologies. It is the war that ensues when a neighbouring nation wishes to annexe the property of another nation, and the resultant insurgence and sponsored rebellion and the presence of the military - and the story of a section of normal people who have lost their freedom to the terror of fire and counter-fire, and have lost the right to lead normal lives. Please do not attribute ISI, or Pakistani militancy to the Islamic ideology.

What happens in Palestine is the struggle of the Palestinians to fight for their land, and their right to live a normal life. It cannot be attributed to Islamic ideology. The cause is right, but the method they have employed is non-Jihadi, because they kill innocent civillians through their retaliation.

I denounce and strongly object to the term "Islamic Terrorism". If an Abdul etc etc.., or an Osama or someone else with an arabic name kills, attribute it to the individual. Not to the faith. If Iran or Afghanisthan people fight, its about Islamic Terrorism. If the US government under Bush goes on fighting and waging wars and killing hundreds and thousands of civillians, why is it not called Christian Terrorism or Bush Terrorism. There is Baj Rang Dal and other outfits that act on extremism, but have u ever heard of Hindu Terrorism.., even when there were many instances of the Baj_Rang-Dal and their likes' inhumane actions? Because, in all these cases, the actions are rightfully attributed to a particular individual or a nation or a sect, not to the theology or ideology.Why the Hell, the double standards!!!

When there was an attack at the IISC campus in Bangalore, I was warned by a friend against wearing my head scarf and venturing out. Why? Was I responsible in any way? Did I contribute to it even at a mental level?? Did I morally support it? Then why me?

At my work place, I find the foreigner lady looking at me uneasily.. coz I have this scarf around me... it proclaims that I am a Muslim. When I resist the compulsory singing of Vande Mataram, I am indirectly likened to a Pakisthani by friends with whom I have studied for 4 yrs, by colleagues who have been around me for months. I am hunted down and victimised. I am outraged.., grievously outraged.